It looks like the almighty CDC contradicts itself, because on 5 May 2020 it claimed:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... lture.html
SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was isolated in the laboratory and is available for research by the scientific and medical community.
Here’s the CDC’s article on isolating the virus. From June 2020 (that’s before admitting that COVID-19 had NOT been isolated).
One of many problem is that they claim to have used PCR to isolate the virus (which is impossible!):
The following paper by David Crowe looks like it’s aimed at “professionals” – scientists and other quacks working in the medical field – but for most others it’s boring (and too long).
If you’re interested in:
No purified coronavirus was isolated and why this is important;
Why the PCR test shouldn’t be used like this.
This could be THE paper you want to read.
David Richard Crowe died on 12 July 2020 of “cancer”, aged 63 years.
As they haven’t been able to purify viral particles of COVID-19, every “positive” test is per definition - a false positive.
As there are no distinctive symptoms, a COVID-19 infection cannot be diagnosed in any other way either.
The COVID-19 test is based on PCR, which doesn’t produce a positive/negative result, but the number of cycles required to detect sufficient material to beat the arbitrary cut-off between positive and negative. Because of this the best the test could do is estimate the chance that the subject is infected, but I think it’s safe to say that the PCR test could only determine a non-infection (as it is excellent to find very small amounts).
There is no “scientific” certainty of what the cut-off number of cycles would be to produce a negative – some say as low as 30 others go as high as 45 cycles as the cut-off (to produce a negative test result – no infection).
Because the PCR test shouldn’t be used like this, repeatedly test result have gone from positive/negative/positive and back again in a couple of days.
David Crowe – Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory
(Version 6 was first published on 12 March 2020; the latest is dated 6 June 2020, 5 weeks before his death): https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf
(http://web.archive.org/web/202004041823 ... sPanic.pdf
The following relatively long article has more information on the NOT isolation of the amazing COVID-19.
A virus should be isolated purified viruses, but all the 4 scientific papers that claimed to have “isolated” THE coronavirus, admitted that their pictures aren’t of purified, isolated viruses.
Co-author of “Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health” (March 2020), Malik Peiris, admitted:
“The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus
Co-author of “Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19” (February 2020), Myung-Guk Han, admitted:
“We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells
Co-author of “Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea” (24 February 2020), Wan Beom Park, admitted:
“We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification
Co-author of “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China” (20 February 2020), Wenjie Tan, admitted:
“[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones
”: https://www.globalresearch.ca/national- ... es/5720271