Firestarter wrote: ↑Sat Dec 03, 2022 6:49 pm
Yep, the Hunter Biden laptop is very interesting, but now instead of interesting information on what is on the laptop, we get another story of censorship (the 50th story or more?) on this story, to manipulate the 2020 US presidential election, this time blaming Twitter.
So we don't get much of anything on the most important story (?) on Hunter's laptop, that is that he - together with ketchup billionaire Christopher Heinz in Rosemont Seneca - were corruptly dealing with China (besides the Ukraine, which was already known).
But now we DO get stories on the censorship of the laptop story, which originally was all about Hunter's prostitute and crack addictions, and was also already known.
Twitter CEO and co-founder Jack Dorsey demanded from Elon Musk that all information related to the "Twitter Files" be released "without filter".
After which Elon Musk admitted that the first "Twitter files" release was censored, and that information was "hidden" and "deleted".
So now finally we get an interesting substory (that was probably planned all along, by Musk and Dorsey) that it was Twitter Deputy General Counsel from June 2020, James Baker, who "vetted" the Twitter Files, and was fired by Elon Musk over it. It is now also insinuated that it was really James Baker that censored the laptop story on Twitter all along: https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking- ... tter-files
This is interesting as James Baker was the FBI General Counsel, before becoming a Brookings Institution fellow, and then joining Twitter.
James Baker didn't agree that former FBI Director James Comey decided not to charge Hillary Clinton for sending classified information over private email server: https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house ... s-but-was/