All good, thanks for the links. I was just curious as I have encountered the use of the "success" of the polio vaccine as a pro-vaccine supporting stance for the Covid-19 "vaccine" products. I've had nothing to say on the subject, because from what I am told; A polio vaccine was produced and now polio is no longer a threat here in Australia. So I don't really know if it was a case of a modern medical success or just another media-driven lie...Onthefence wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 6:26 am ok fuck it i cant keep reading through all this its depressing. I do remember reading something doesn't mean its true doesn't mean my memory is correct either., probably should have thought about that before i made the remark. Meh
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory ... s-67287290
just read this one though, Headline reads 'More polio cases now caused by vaccine than by wild virus' but the go onto explain they need to immunize more that 95% of the population. Sure that makes perfect sense????
Yes, just quickly looking into it I came across very similar information. Use of the insecticide DDT being a likely cause of polio-like symptoms and/or diagnoses. Which makes perfect sense when you indiscriminately smother children with a nerve gas as the media had promoted ("DDT is good for me-e-e!") - No coincidence there would be ensuing nerve damage causing pain and muscular paralysis?Firestarter wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 6:31 am I haven't seen that statistic.
If you're interesting in polio vaccines. It was the first "vaccine" topic that I investigated (many pictures of graphs taken down).
The polio virus doesn't cause paralysis, so obviously the polio vaccine won't prevent people from being crippled.
The oral polio vaccine pushed by Bill Gates actually causes paralysis, which is then labelled "non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP)" so while the paralysis rates increase because of the vaccine, they still claim that the polio rates go down?!?
--> http://www.veganvillage.org/Article-Fea ... sible.html
This page shows a short excerpt from the 2008 book "Fear of the Invisible" by Janine Roberts (died in 2016). It looks like the good Old Boys were up to the same tactics in the 1950s that we are seeing play out now...
Children inoculated with one brand of the vaccine, the Cutter, had developed poliomyelitis.
Within two weeks [after announcing the vaccine] nearly 200 vaccinated children had gone down with polio. This produced near panic in the White House. It was not yet summer. Polio normally did not strike at this time.
President Eisenhower had publicly endorsed this vaccine and did not want any failures on his watch. US Health Secretary Oveta Hobby thus went to see the Surgeon General to sternly say the president needed to be spared further embarrassment!
Within days, on 8 May 1955, the Surgeon General suspended the entire US production of the vaccine and called for emergency meetings with Salk and the manufacturers.
Now, this is good...
Yes, "Lumpy vaccines" sounds plausible. Just give it a good shake before injecting and you should be all good...They then agreed that these cases were caused by polioviruses surviving the formaldehyde poisoning by being inside "lumps in the vaccine".
The manufacturers agreed to stir their vaccine better, the public were told they had no further need to worry, and the distribution of the vaccine resumed after only a five-day break.
Now we move into some more "modern tactics"...
I found firm evidence that the regulatory authorities had employed from 1960 another weapon from their armory to bring down the numbers of reported polio cases. They promulgated new regulations that rewrote the rules for polio diagnosis, effectively wiping polio nearly out of existence by simply changing the rules for polio diagnosis.
In 1956, the health authorities instructed doctors that they were in future only to diagnose polio if a patient has paralytic symptoms for 60 days or more. As polio was diagnosed previously if there were just 24 hours of paralytic symptoms, and as the disease in milder cases frequently lasted less than 60 days, this automatically meant vastly fewer cases of polio would be reported.
And the bullshit detector is buzzing...
Sounds a bit like our "novel" friend "SpikeVax" at play... But isn't Moderna developing NEW tech?Furthermore, it was now decreed that all cases of polio occurring within 30 days of vaccination were to be recorded, not as possibly caused by the vaccine, but as "pre-existing". This regulatory change also ensured that far fewer cases of vaccine failure would be recorded.
Another regulatory change had an even greater impact. Most polio diagnoses during the epidemics had not involved paralysis but muscular weakness and widespread pain.
In many cases this was produced by inflammation of the membrane that protects the brain and spinal neuron cells. The CDC described such cases as "serious but rarely fatal".
Thus began the common diagnosis we now see as "Meningitis"...But doctors were now instructed that all such cases must no longer be diagnosed as polio but as viral or aseptic MENINGITIS.
BINGO! Polio was "eradicated" through reclassification... Vaccines for the Win!But this reclassification of polio cases seemingly did not satisfy the regulatory authorities. Apparently there were still too many cases of the worst kind of polio, "paralytic polio" - so it was finally decided that these cases must also be removed from the polio case registry, thus eliminating nearly all the remaining cases of polio in the world - giving the vaccine a stunning and utterly fraudulent victory.
This was achieved by announcing that in future all patients with the classic polio paralytic symptoms were to be diagnosed initially as having "Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP)" and thus reported to the regulatory authorities.