my take on "the joos"

[Robo]

In an organisation that has 1000's of staff, many in similar positions to the above, it doesn't surprise me that there's a relatively small number of Jews in the organisation.

You had a go at me for linking to the BBC, but I don't subscribe to woke cancel culture. If we start censoring and cancelling news sources, you only become as bad as the people you dislike.

I do empathise a little, however, when I see a link to an article by the BBC. I also experience that gut reaction, but I overcome that feeling and would not attack the poster. I would not be offended (that's another thing that's characteristic of the extreme woke left, which is only the flip-side of the coin of the extreme-right... - I've observed they both share similar emotional traits)... I wouldn't be offended because I'm grown up and I can handle recognising information for what it is and where it originates from. I don't need a Big Brother, or a Big Sister, associated with the white fluffy stuff coming down from the sky, to complain to me that I've offended them for linking to the BBC. I would not give in to the urge to patronise a poster who posted such a link. Going down that path is too Big Brother-like. If a post's offensive, just click the "report" button and it can be dealt with by a moderator.

Yes, it's the Big Brother Corporation, and yes, it should be scrutinised and criticised where appropriate, like with the Jimmy Savile disgrace - we know all that and need to find out more, but censorship, I don't like that.

So, back to the Jews... So what if they're Jews? Am I missing something? Why make it about the Jews when you haven't stipulated what point you're trying to make beyond them being Jews?

[Chief Bromden]

Post by Robo » Thu May 25, 2023 6:13 pm
"In an organisation that has 1000's of staff, many in similar positions to the above, it doesn't surprise me that there's a relatively small number of Jews in the organisation"


You are distorting the truth. Those positions are senior positions. Jews represent 0.5% of the population in the UK. They are vastly
over represented in senior position within the BBC. I would say the same if Muslims were over represented in a similar same way.

And by the way, this is a thread about Jews, so that's why I posted the information.

This is not a complete list

[Firestarter]

I sometimes investigate the psychopaths that are running the "deep state", and find out that indeed a lot of them are "Jews".

It is no secret that Donald Trump is very close to the Chabad-Lubavitch cult, with his Jewish daughter Ivanka even a cult member.
The "Macro" deep state network that is controlled by the Dutch royals with the help of British secret intlligence is literally swamped with "Jews".
.

Isn't find it strange that there are so many "Jews" in both the deep state, lobbying, consultancy think tank network that controls senile Joe and his administration?!?
See 15 Jews in senior positions in the Biden administration (only 1 "stein"): https://www.neaman.org.il/EN/Files/Bide ... 202021.pdf

viewtopic.php?p=40245#p40245

[Robo]

Post by Robo » Thu May 25, 2023 6:13 pm
"In an organisation that has 1000's of staff, many in similar positions to the above, it doesn't surprise me that there's a relatively small number of Jews in the organisation"


You are distorting the truth. Those positions are senior positions. Jews represent 0.5% of the population in the UK. They are vastly
over represented in senior position within the BBC. I would say the same if Muslims were over represented in a similar same way.

And by the way, this is a thread about Jews, so that's why I posted the information.

This is not a complete list

Thanks for your reply and it's good we're still communicating. I think you're trying to understand the nature of the reality we're in, just like Firestarter and Truthspoon. I'm trying to do the same thing, so I think we have something in common.

What I'm trying to understand here is what are we to deduce from the fact that so many Jews are in these positions. IOW, where do you see the next stepping stone that we can land on to go forwards with our understanding of things?

[Chief Bromden]

Post by Robo » Thu May 25, 2023 6:13 pm
"In an organisation that has 1000's of staff, many in similar positions to the above, it doesn't surprise me that there's a relatively small number of Jews in the organisation"


You are distorting the truth. Those positions are senior positions. Jews represent 0.5% of the population in the UK. They are vastly
over represented in senior position within the BBC. I would say the same if Muslims were over represented in a similar same way.

And by the way, this is a thread about Jews, so that's why I posted the information.

This is not a complete list

Thanks for your reply and it's good we're still communicating. I think you're trying to understand the nature of the reality we're in, just like Firestarter and Truthspoon. I'm trying to do the same thing, so I think we have something in common.

What I'm trying to understand here is what are we to deduce from the fact that so many Jews are in these positions. IOW, where do you see the next stepping stone that we can land on to go forwards with our understanding of things?

I said I would not reply to you on the other thread because we were both off topic and you asked me "are you in some cult you want me to be part of"

At that point I decided to leave the discussion because imo you were trying to defame me. Anyone who has known me online for the last
ten years will know I'm most definitely not a member of any cult.

Anyway thanks for your comment and I will compose a reply later as to why I don't like a small minority of people holding so much power, wealth and
influence. I would say the same if a minority of for example Muslims or transgenders or homosexuals or Buddists or feminists or Satanists etc disproportionately
were prominent in the media as well as major Corporations, big pharma, banking and most spheres of power.

[Chief Bromden]

Have you watched this film Robo? Bravo to this Israeli Jewish film maker.



The full version can be viewed online. You might learn something.

[Robo]

I said I would not reply to you on the other thread because we were both off topic and you asked me "are you in some cult you want me to be part of"

At that point I decided to leave the discussion because imo you were trying to defame me. Anyone who has known me online for the last
ten years will know I'm most definitely not a member of any cult.

Anyway thanks for your comment and I will compose a reply later as to why I don't like a small minority of people holding so much power, wealth and
influence.

Thanks again for your reply, but I had to use such strong terms as 'cult' in order to communicate to you the strength of how I felt with your aspersion against me regarding your criticism about the links I posted to BBC news articles. Anyone who knows me will also know that I don't promote any shortcomings of the BBC, and I took your comments as an attempt to defame me. I look forward to your reply.

I would say the same if a minority of for example Muslims or transgenders or homosexuals or Buddists or feminists or Satanists etc disproportionately were prominent in the media as well as major Corporations, big pharma, banking and most spheres of power.

I understand what you're saying, but it still leaves the question unanswered, which is what is larger point you're making about that. You haven't said, but may be you will in the post you said you're going to compose later.

[Robo]

Have you watched this film Robo? Bravo to this Israeli Jewish film maker.



The full version can be viewed online. You might learn something.

From the end of the video clip:

"The Jews are not as powerful as Jews think we are, nor as powerful as the enemies think we are."

I agree with the above quote.

I watched the video but, regardless of your patronising comment, there was nothing in it I didn't already know and I agree with a lot of what the Jews in the presentation said, but I still don't know what point you're trying to make. Why can't you put it into your own words what exactly it is you're trying to say?

[Chief Bromden]

I said I would not reply to you on the other thread because we were both off topic and you asked me "are you in some cult you want me to be part of"

At that point I decided to leave the discussion because imo you were trying to defame me. Anyone who has known me online for the last
ten years will know I'm most definitely not a member of any cult.

Anyway thanks for your comment and I will compose a reply later as to why I don't like a small minority of people holding so much power, wealth and
influence.

Thanks again for your reply, but I had to use such strong terms as 'cult' in order to communicate to you the strength of how I felt with your aspersion against me regarding your criticism about the links I posted to BBC news articles. Anyone who knows me will also know that I don't promote any shortcomings of the BBC, and I took your comments as an attempt to defame me. I look forward to your reply.

I would say the same if a minority of for example Muslims or transgenders or homosexuals or Buddists or feminists or Satanists etc disproportionately were prominent in the media as well as major Corporations, big pharma, banking and most spheres of power.

I understand what you're saying, but it still leaves the question unanswered, which is what is larger point you're making about that. You haven't said, but may be you will in the post you said you're going to compose later.

As usual Robo you worm your way out. There is a difference to my criticism of you posting BBC links to that of insinuating I am a member of a cult.

I think members on the forum can see this.

[Robo]

As usual Robo you worm your way out. There is a difference to my criticism of you posting BBC links to that of insinuating I am a member of a cult.

I think members on the forum can see this.

I'm not worming my way out of anything. I wasn't saying that you are a member of a literal cult. I was saying that you came across as someone having that mindset, and it was also wasn't a statement, it was a question... not even a literal question as it was rhetorical, and as I explained in my previous post, I had to use such a strong term to counter your defamatory accusation against me, and to register my strong feelings with that regard.