lovely , but is it jewish? I'd say you've got your wires crossed again, but that house looks like a candles and muscles and seashells habitation.Boadicea wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 3:58 am I Do Prefer Rounded Corners.
As in Adobe, Mud Earth Ships.
Mum has a Yurt as her Worshop and Art Studio/Gallery.
They Make Nice Dodecahedron Homes....
Hows This for Cozy?
Inside is Like a Tardis and There's Room to Fit the Whole Crow Bar In There...
Hobbit House.jpg
my take on "the joos"
-
- Posts: 3047
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 2:35 am
- Has thanked: 685 times
- Been thanked: 1226 times
Re: my take on "the joos"
-
- Posts: 3047
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 2:35 am
- Has thanked: 685 times
- Been thanked: 1226 times
Re: my take on "the joos"
interesting case cause the defendant Leifer fled to Israel and it took years to get her back here. she pretended there to be an invalid, was caught shopping etc, and she exhausted all legal means to avoid extradition. finally she stood trial.
hell hath no fury like those jewish girls.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-03-08/ ... /102069580
"At the start of the trial, Mrs Leifer was facing 29 charges, however, earlier this week she was acquitted of two counts of an indecent act
with a 16- or 17-year-old child.
The legislation used against Mrs Leifer for those charges came into effect on December 1, 2006. However, the court heard if the alleged offending relating to those charges did occur, it was during November 2006."
but sometimes they (innocent jews with good jewish lawyers) can win in legal land, by the hair of their chinny chin chins.
let us not say that Israel never extradites its (alleged) criminals.
hell hath no fury like those jewish girls.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-03-08/ ... /102069580
"At the start of the trial, Mrs Leifer was facing 29 charges, however, earlier this week she was acquitted of two counts of an indecent act
with a 16- or 17-year-old child.
The legislation used against Mrs Leifer for those charges came into effect on December 1, 2006. However, the court heard if the alleged offending relating to those charges did occur, it was during November 2006."
but sometimes they (innocent jews with good jewish lawyers) can win in legal land, by the hair of their chinny chin chins.
let us not say that Israel never extradites its (alleged) criminals.
-
- Posts: 3047
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 2:35 am
- Has thanked: 685 times
- Been thanked: 1226 times
Re: my take on "the joos"
but not all Chief Priests of the world say 'it is ok to rape prisoners' but ALL jewish nations do.
-
- Posts: 3047
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 2:35 am
- Has thanked: 685 times
- Been thanked: 1226 times
Re: my take on "the joos"
keep pushin up them daisies robo, peace and love to your masters who are out to screw you.
and THIS VVVVVVVVVV is why when reading such as Quigley I look for the jews... which leads to the bankers and trillionaires.
but hare hare krushna to all you groovey feel gooders out there who would not name a hammer if it hit them on the head. Maxwells silver and gold hammer make sure that we are dead /Beatleseque
http://mileswmathis.com/hare.pdf
"On the way out, I will briefly comment on Larouche and Coleman, whom I mentioned earlier. I said
they were misdirecting. How? Well, I assume the project had been blown by the time they arrived, so
the only thing they could do is admit the main lines but deflect attention away from the real players.
Remember, they admit Coleman was MI6 and I assume Larouche was Intel as well, though I don't
know which department he was in. So they throw Theo Adorno under the bus, along with Tavistock,
although they had little or nothing to do with the project. Adorno may have been involved on some
level, but he was not writing songs or running the project. That is absurd. This was a direct project of
MI6, using its American arm BSC. That is now admitted even at places like Wikipedia. As such, they
didn't need any Club of Rome or any of those other Dan Brown/DaVinci Code organizations: that was
just the usual misdirection away from the Jews. We are supposed to believe it was the Jesuits, as usual,
without of course admitting the Jesuits are also Jews. So these theories are a “hide-the-Jewish-
influence” fiction, as always. It was everyone except the trillionaire Jewish bankers. It was the Pope
and the Illuminati and the Merovingians and little green men with lizard eyes. They were also doing
everything possible to hide the Stanleys and Cohens, since Lennon himself was a Stanley. Yes,
Larouche and Coleman strangely forget to mention that all these boy in the bands were upper peerage,
just pretending to be cockney lowlifes. Huge amounts of energy is expended and ink spilled to deflect
you away from seeing that, because the projects could possibly survive people knowing these bands
were promoted by Intel. What they couldn't survive is people coming to realize their heroes like
Lennon and McCartney and Jagger and even Richards were peerage actors with direct links to the
Queen, who were not only not writing the songs, but who were not even taking any of this seriously. It
was one more fantastic conjob, and the main place Larouche and Coleman were right is in its purpose:
destabilization and societal transformation, to benefit the already obscenely wealthy. But they even
play that down, I would say, admitting it but not admitting the full and crushing evil of it. They want
you to believe these projects had no government ties (Tavistock being independent), and that they were
run secretly by people like Prince Lowenstein. It was all a dastardly infiltration, you know. Except
that it wasn't. It was state-sponsored terrorism of the most direct kind on its own people, and all the top
names signed off, including the Queen, the Prime Minister, the President, the Congress, Parliament,
and the heads of CIA, MI6, FBI, etc. And it was all done with your taxdollars. Yes, you paid for your
own destabilization. You paid for your own disempowerment. You have been forced to bankroll the
death and destruction around you, and it has been going on for centuries."
and THIS VVVVVVVVVV is why when reading such as Quigley I look for the jews... which leads to the bankers and trillionaires.
but hare hare krushna to all you groovey feel gooders out there who would not name a hammer if it hit them on the head. Maxwells silver and gold hammer make sure that we are dead /Beatleseque
http://mileswmathis.com/hare.pdf
"On the way out, I will briefly comment on Larouche and Coleman, whom I mentioned earlier. I said
they were misdirecting. How? Well, I assume the project had been blown by the time they arrived, so
the only thing they could do is admit the main lines but deflect attention away from the real players.
Remember, they admit Coleman was MI6 and I assume Larouche was Intel as well, though I don't
know which department he was in. So they throw Theo Adorno under the bus, along with Tavistock,
although they had little or nothing to do with the project. Adorno may have been involved on some
level, but he was not writing songs or running the project. That is absurd. This was a direct project of
MI6, using its American arm BSC. That is now admitted even at places like Wikipedia. As such, they
didn't need any Club of Rome or any of those other Dan Brown/DaVinci Code organizations: that was
just the usual misdirection away from the Jews. We are supposed to believe it was the Jesuits, as usual,
without of course admitting the Jesuits are also Jews. So these theories are a “hide-the-Jewish-
influence” fiction, as always. It was everyone except the trillionaire Jewish bankers. It was the Pope
and the Illuminati and the Merovingians and little green men with lizard eyes. They were also doing
everything possible to hide the Stanleys and Cohens, since Lennon himself was a Stanley. Yes,
Larouche and Coleman strangely forget to mention that all these boy in the bands were upper peerage,
just pretending to be cockney lowlifes. Huge amounts of energy is expended and ink spilled to deflect
you away from seeing that, because the projects could possibly survive people knowing these bands
were promoted by Intel. What they couldn't survive is people coming to realize their heroes like
Lennon and McCartney and Jagger and even Richards were peerage actors with direct links to the
Queen, who were not only not writing the songs, but who were not even taking any of this seriously. It
was one more fantastic conjob, and the main place Larouche and Coleman were right is in its purpose:
destabilization and societal transformation, to benefit the already obscenely wealthy. But they even
play that down, I would say, admitting it but not admitting the full and crushing evil of it. They want
you to believe these projects had no government ties (Tavistock being independent), and that they were
run secretly by people like Prince Lowenstein. It was all a dastardly infiltration, you know. Except
that it wasn't. It was state-sponsored terrorism of the most direct kind on its own people, and all the top
names signed off, including the Queen, the Prime Minister, the President, the Congress, Parliament,
and the heads of CIA, MI6, FBI, etc. And it was all done with your taxdollars. Yes, you paid for your
own destabilization. You paid for your own disempowerment. You have been forced to bankroll the
death and destruction around you, and it has been going on for centuries."
-
- Posts: 3047
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 2:35 am
- Has thanked: 685 times
- Been thanked: 1226 times
Re: my take on "the joos"
https://www.verywellmind.com/sabina-spi ... 42-2795521
carl jungs girlfriend , a looney he fished out of the looney bin, the first woman to do analytical psychology (playing with toys in sandpits) was a jew.
that one did take me by surprise, I must admit.
carl jungs girlfriend , a looney he fished out of the looney bin, the first woman to do analytical psychology (playing with toys in sandpits) was a jew.
that one did take me by surprise, I must admit.
- Robo
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2022 2:26 pm
- Location: London (UK)
- Has thanked: 48 times
- Been thanked: 100 times
Re: my take on "the joos"
What's the point about her being a Jew?pierre wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:15 am https://www.verywellmind.com/sabina-spi ... 42-2795521
carl jungs girlfriend , a looney he fished out of the looney bin, the first woman to do analytical psychology (playing with toys in sandpits) was a jew.
that one did take me by surprise, I must admit.
-
- Posts: 3047
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 2:35 am
- Has thanked: 685 times
- Been thanked: 1226 times
Re: my take on "the joos"
i you do not know my point by now, stop asking juvenile passive aggressive questions. you have made it clear that even if all the powers that are and have been have blue spotted skin, there is nothing about blue spotted skin that has anything at all to do with power.Robo wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:20 amWhat's the point about her being a Jew?pierre wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:15 am https://www.verywellmind.com/sabina-spi ... 42-2795521
carl jungs girlfriend , a looney he fished out of the looney bin, the first woman to do analytical psychology (playing with toys in sandpits) was a jew.
that one did take me by surprise, I must admit.
I bet jungs next mistress Wollf was a jew too.
all just cohencidences.
- Robo
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2022 2:26 pm
- Location: London (UK)
- Has thanked: 48 times
- Been thanked: 100 times
Re: my take on "the joos"
It's what's in a person's heart that's important, for good or for ill, and only God can be judge of that. Jesus Christ was Jewish.pierre wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:30 ami you do not know my point by now, stop asking juvenile passive aggressive questions. you have made it clear that even if all the powers that are and have been have blue spotted skin, there is nothing about blue spotted skin that has anything at all to do with power.Robo wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:20 amWhat's the point about her being a Jew?pierre wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:15 am https://www.verywellmind.com/sabina-spi ... 42-2795521
carl jungs girlfriend , a looney he fished out of the looney bin, the first woman to do analytical psychology (playing with toys in sandpits) was a jew.
that one did take me by surprise, I must admit.
I bet jungs next mistress Wollf was a jew too.
all just cohencidences.