Carolingian bloodline, Anunnaki, and the Order of the Garter

[Firestarter]

Carolus “Charles” Martel (688-741) is the founder of the Carolingian dynasty.
With all of the top aristocratic families in Europe descending from his daughter Alda and Rabbi Makhir, in particular from Alda’s son Guillaume de Gellone (a.k.a. William of Orange) and daughter Ida Redburga, arguably the Carolingians still rule the world.

The Holy Roman Empire was founded by another grandson of Carolus “Charles” Martel, King Charlemagne (the nephew of Alda).

For the short explanation of the difference between the Merovians and Carolingians (that replaced the Merovians as Kings of the Franks), see the following picture.
In this picture Rabbi Makhir of the Davidic bloodline, is called Theuderic IV, who married the daughter of King Charles Martel, Princess Alda, a.k.a. Aldana, a.k.a. Aida, a.k.a. Aude of Toulouse.


The most famous grandson of Charles Martel was Charlemagne (note the eagle and lion... of Judah).

http://archive.is/G69W9

[Firestarter]

The Carolingians deposed the Merovingians as kings of the Franks through a fraudulent deal with the papacy, which gave the pope the power to then annoint King Pepin the short (a.k.a. Pippin) in 754.

On 28 July 754, Pope Stephen annointed Pepin and his 2 sons Charles and Carloman (giving them the title Patricius Romanorum), and depose the Merovingian kings.
In return Pope Stephen got the Donation of Constantine (Donatio Constantini) in which the 4th-century Roman emperor Constantine supposedly transferred authority over Rome and the Western part of the Roman Empire to Pope Sylvester I (if so, why would he give the Frankish Empire to a King?).

See a painting of Constantine donating to Sylvester...


The Donation of Pepin was confirmed by Pepin’s successors, King Charlemagne and Louis the Pious in 778 and 817 respectively.
From 756 to 1929, ended by Mussolini, the Catholic Church had an empire and the Carolingian dynasty, united in the Order of the Garter, is still the most powerful in the world

It took until 1440 that Lorenzo Vallo proved that the Donation of Constantine was written several centuries after Constantine had been emperor. There couldn’t have been a King Pepin, let alone a Donation of Pepin, without it. But they didn’t “change” the history that was all based on this forgery (continuing to this day): http://lopezmedia.net/blog/6/4/2018
(http://web.archive.org/web/201902121537 ... g/6/4/2018)

[Firestarter]

For thousands of years, the elite have claimed to have the divine right to rule over the "human clay" as pharaohs, emperors or kings because they descend from the Godhead.
These days they do it a little more nuanced, using media and movies to portray the royals as "noble" great human beings, while behind the scenes they continue to claim that they descend from the Gods.

The elite claim to descend from Anu's son Enlil (the serpent). From the Trinity of the Scythian/Sumerian Anu (the Great Father of the Sky) and his sons Enki and Enlil.
The offspring of Anu (whose parents were Anshar and Kishar) are the Anunnaki.

See Enlil and Enki around the World tree.


Also interesting is the original version of the tale of Noah's ark, and the flood...
One day Enlil decides that he’s fed up with “creation” so decides to flood earth to exterminate all beings.
Enki doesn’t agree, so he warns the hero Atra-hasis (or Utnapishtim) to build an Ark and fill it with animals. With his wife he preserved life on earth; after the waters receded, he released the animals to repopulate the planet: http://www.annunaki.org/enki-enlil/
(http://archive.is/AzhrS)

[Firestarter]

My conclusion is that the story of creation from the book of Genesis from the Tanach (a.k.a. Old Testament) is based on the Sumerian story on creation. Naturally man was made from clay...


Man made in OUR image
I've never quite been able to understand New Testament Christian Trinity, God is one but also 3. Besides that I've never grasped the notion of the "Holy Spirit".
Now according to some Christians the following example from the Old Testament, really refers to the (Christian?) Trinity.

Genesis 1:26-27

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Now this surely fits in with the Sumerian story of creation by the Anunnaki, but NOT with what most Christians have been told to believe. Not withstanding the notion that this is really, somehow the Trinity creating man from clay...


One of the famous stories from the Bible is that the son of Eve, Cain, murdered his brother Abel...
There are many names for the "bloodlines of the Illuminati", one of these names is Canaanites or the Bloodline of Cain. Of course the elite don't really descend from Cain (or the Anunnaki) at all, or are really shapeshifting reptilians...


Cain – son of the “LORD”?
Genesis 4:1-2

And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.
And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.

I read here that Eve had gotten Cain “from the LORD”, which looks like she was inseminated by the “LORD” (a.k.a. the serpent, Enlil).

Genesis 4:25:

And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.

Adam and Eve had another son after the slewn Abel – Seth (when Adam was 130 years old). This again seems to confirm that Cain wasn’t the son of Adam (and that Abel had been Adam’s only son before Seth)…

Genesis 5:1-3:

This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him;
Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.
And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, and after his image; and called his name Seth:

This looks to me like the most explicit reference in Genesis that Cain wasn’t the first son of Adam!


Who was Cain afraid of?
After Cain slew his (half)brother Abel, “the LORD” expels him from Eden and Cain replies…
Genesis 4:14-15:

Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me.
And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.

Who was Cain afraid of when Adam and Eve and their children in Eden were the only humans on earth?!?


Who was Cain’s wife?
Then Cain went to Nod (east of Eden), and then...
Genesis 4:16-17:

And Cain went out from the presence of the LORD, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden.
And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.

I don’t read here that he took a wife with him, so conclude that she wasn’t the daughter of Eve, but he “found” her in (or on his way to) Nod…
The official explanation is that she must have been his sister though, because Adam and Eve where the first (and until Cain) only humans on earth (some call her “Awan” or that she could also have been his niece).
Or maybe Genesis 4:14 explains that many of the children of Adam and Eve had already left Eden?!?


Who were Ishmael’s and Isaac’s father?
Ishmael is Ahraham’s son from Sarah’s slave Hagar (when Abraham was 86). Genesis 20:9
Then God promises to give the elderly Abraham and Sarah (respecively 100 and 90 years old) a son - Isaac. Genesis 17:16-23

First they leave for Egypt and Abimelech took Sarah as his wife…
Genesis 20:2-4

And Abraham said of Sarah his wife, She is my sister: and Abimelech king of Gerar sent, and took Sarah.
But God came to Abimelech in a dream by night, and said to him, Behold, thou art but a dead man, for the woman which thou hast taken; for she is a man's wife.
But Abimelech had not come near her: and he said, Lord, wilt thou slay also a righteous nation?

.
And then Sarah bears a son – Isaac…
Genesis 21:1-3

And the Lord visited Sarah as he had said, and the Lord did unto Sarah as he had spoken.
For Sarah conceived, and bare Abraham a son in his old age, at the set time of which God had spoken to him.
And Abraham called the name of his son that was born unto him, whom Sarah bare to him, Isaac.

Would this be the son of the elderly Abraham, Abimelech (who did “not come near her”) or "the Lord" (a.k.a. the serpent Enlil)?!?

And then comes one of the (in my opinion) most horrible things in the Bible, where God orders Abraham to sacrifice his “only son Isaac”…
Genesis 22:1,2

And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham, and said unto him, Abraham: and he said, Behold, here I am.
And he said, Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of.

If Isaac was Abraham's “only son”, then who was Ishmael’s father?!?

[Firestarter]

Long before I started this thread on this forum, I started my investigation of this topic with the writings of Nicholas de Vere.

Just about everything about his book is wrong, it has no reference list, while even more damaging Nicholas de Vere poses as a satanic, vampire, witch, psychopath...
But despite everything that's wrong about the book, the shocking information checks out.
I can't really recommend the book though, because it's practically unreadable. I think what makes it unreadable is that De Vere writes as an insider to insiders.

In reality Prince Nicholas de Vere von Drakenberg wasn't a royal highness "insider" at all, but simply Nicholas Thomas Weir who researched satanism, the royal bloodlines and the secret societies that behind it all control the New World Order.
The result is a book that reads like the first hand account of a psychopath, who believes he's better than everybody else because of his royal descendency (tracing his supposed ancestry all the way back to Enlil and Anu). I don't know how much De Vere actually believed of his "superiority", and we can't ask him as he died under suspicious circumstances of reported "natural causes"...


Here's the draft version of his book.
Nicholas de Vere - From Transylvania to Tunbridge Wells – The dragon legacy: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/drago ... ourt02.htm

Here's the definitive, published version of his book.
Nicholas de Vere – The Dragon legacy (2004), 13.4 MB: http://sirius-star.ro/wp-content/upload ... e-Vere.pdf


The following interview with Nicholas de Vere works better for an introduction because it’s much shorter and easier to read than his book.

He explains the ancestry of the royal, Aryan bloodline as follows:

In brief, the recorded Dragon lineage starts with the Annunaki and descends through the proto-Scythians, the Sumerians in one branch and the early Egyptians in another; the Phoenicians, the Mittani, back to the Scythians again through marital alliance, along to the "Tuatha de Danaan" and the Fir Bolg; down through their Arch-Druidic, Priest-Princely families, to the Royal Picts of Scotland and the high kings of the Horse Lords of Dal Riada; through to the Elven dynasty of Pendragon and Avallon del Acqs, and down to a few pure bred families today.

http://www.whale.to/b/vere.html

[Firestarter]

David Livingstone wrote a book (published in 2007) in which he argues that the "Mithraic" bloodline has controlled what's been happening on earth for thousands of years, culminating in the “War on terror” (which has since 2020 evolved into the "War on COVID”).

It's an interesting collection of information that includes information on both the Carolingian dynasty (as offspring of the "Mithraic" bloodline) and the Order of the Garter (that rules the world).
David Livingstone describes that the Carolingians represented the union of the "Mithraic" bloodline. Their lineage included the royal dynasty of Armenia, but also branches of Eastern European aristocracies of Poland, Bulgaria and Hungary, that descended from the Khazars. The grandfather of Charlemagne, Charles Martel, was the primary representative of the "Mithraic" bloodline.

Unfortunately Livingstone never reached the level of inside knowledge of Nicholas de Vere, but the book is much better (or maybe I should say easier?) to read than De Vere's writings...

Livingstone also has a website with more information (including most of the information in the 2007 book): https://ordoabchao.ca/volume-one/gog-magog

David Livingstone – Terrorism and the illuminati; a three thousand year history (2007): http://www.lovethetruth.com/books/terro ... minati.pdf

[Angel]

The Trinity in You...

Soul
Mind
Body

One is three and one all at the same time...

Dr. E. Michael Jones on the Logos, the Trinity, Aquinas, and Hegel

[Firestarter]

My favourite source for history (from the 16th century until the 1980s) is Lyndon LaRouche's organisation. Lyndon LaRouche often blames the Anglo–Dutch royals controlled banking system for everything that's wrong with our Brave New World.
While Lyndon LaRouche didn't mention the Order of the Garter, he wrongly accused the Venetian (black) nobility. But in reality the most important operatives of the Anglo–Dutch royals he wrote about are Knights of the Garter...

The article in the following link is mostly about the origins of Freemasonry, founded in the 17th century, when Amsterdam was the opium and money centre of the "civilised" world.
It goes back to the 9th century, but is really about more recent developments, from the start of freemasonry (controlled by the Carolingian dynasty): https://archive.schillerinstitute.com/f ... enice.html


The following is a good book that gives an overview of how the Anglo–Dutch royals hijacked the world, including staging the French and and American revolutions...

With the death of King Ferdinand of Spain in the 16th century, the rule of Venice and the Von Habsburgs was only still contested in Europe (and the New World) by France and the Tudor Dynasty of England.
The Cecil family (that features prominently in the Order of Garter) were prominent in the plot to get rid of the Tudors. The downfall of the Tudors began with Henry VIII's Reformation. When the Cecil´s Stuart candidate became King James I of England (who had become a Knight of the Garter in 1590) in 1603 (who was the first King of Scotland and England), he gave his foreign financial backers a monopoly over the collection of taxes and public debt of Britain.

In the late 16th and early 17th centuries, Venice and Genoa began the practice of trafficking in African slaves. Venetian financiers took control over the economies of England and Holland (including the slave trade).
France had to be destroyed, and Spanish America captured before being lost to the USA. The campaign was directed by Knight of the Garter Earl of Shelburne (William Petty). The eyes, finance and arms were provided by the opium trafficking British East India Company and the Baring Bank.

Anton Chaitkin – Treason in America from Aaron Burr to Averell Harriman, 27.7 MB (1985): http://lust-for-life.org/Lust-For-Life/ ... _670pp.pdf
(http://web.archive.org/web/201907021435 ... _670pp.pdf)

[Firestarter]

It's a bit dubious to call some location or era the origins of a bloodline, because at that supposed point of "origin", the founders of the bloodline still had ancestors. Unless of course you believe in some dubious religious story of creation (Eden, Niburu)...

The Carolingians, like the Merovingians they deposed and the Roman Emperors before them, were/are what is called Aryans, other names they go by are Draconists or witches.
The “real” Aryans are the royal tribe originating from Scythia, more than 6000 years ago, who later went to rule Sumer and ancient India.

In the following picture, the red arrows show the Scythians’ migration to Europe from 721 BC. I'm not sure about the green arrows, showing earlier migration...


According to Nazi legend, the Aryans (Teutons) originated from Ultima Thule, the vanished Land of the North.
Roman geographer Pomponius Mela located Thule north of Scythia.


In reality, the Aryan Hittites were close allies of the Jews whose Draconian royal family, the House of David, were Aryans.
The overwhelming majority of "Jews" these days are AshkeNAZI Jews that are really Khazars, who converted to Judaism and then started calling themselves "Jews" in the 8th century AD (the same era that the Carolingian dynasty was founded by Charles Martel).

As you can see, the Khazaria homeland of the Ashkenazi "Jews", overlaps with Scythia.


Maybe you've noticed some of the lions in the coat of arms of the Carolingian nobility.
This supposedly represents the Lion of Judah as they publicly claim to descend from King David of the Tanach (Old Testament), which would make them crypto-Jews.

See the coat of arms of Queen Elizabeth I (1558-1603) with the two crowned lions. Notice the “blue belt” wrapped around the centre with the text “Honi soit qui mal y pense”; the symbol for the Order of the Garter.

[pierre]

good stuff thanks for posting. I have saved it as a pdf for later.
some favorites of mine are Jordan Maxwell https://jordanmaxwellshow.com/ and https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzUBKN ... iTOMCP4eQA and
miles mathis at mileswmathis.com. miles calls them the phoenecian navy.