Firestarter wrote: ↑Sat Nov 05, 2022 8:46 amAnother horrible conspiracy theorist, Richard D. Hall, is being sued in the UK for defamation and harassment by supposed victims and survivors of the 22 May 2017 Manchester Arena bombing, including Martin Hibbert.
Richard D. Hall has put his book on the Manchester "bang" on his website, at 435 pages it's too long. But at the very least it shows that he did a serious investigation to reach the conclusions that the "bang" was a more like fireworks than an actual bomb, nobody died, all the witnesses were "crisis actors", and:
Of the participants about 20 were to be given new lives in other parts of the world, and it would be reported in the media that they had died. New homes for those being relocated would have been organised in advance. A small number, perhaps 1 or 2 of those named as deceased had already recently died prior to the event in an accident or some other scenario.
.
The most important evidence that the official story of a suicide bomber killing 22 people (and himself of course) is bogus is the shown aftermath.
This is the "photo" that was mostly shown with blurred spots (it is actually a still from a short video), allegedly taken by the homeless Chris Parker (note the advertisement with "WEAREMANCHESTER").
Some of these people could be injured, but I don’t see any severe wounds...
.
Here is another 43 seconds video by foyer witness John Barr, shortly after the supposed bomb (see the advertisement with "We are entertainment").
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_guest. ... 941&part=1
Especially the video shows that no bomb exploded here that killed 23, besides the lack of casualties there is hardly damage to the foyer. The damage would include glass shattered everywhere (including from the glass foyer skylight).
While there were CCTV cameras in the foyer, no footage of the time before or the aftermath of the supposed blast has been released.
EXIF data of the Chris Parker still give the time of the photo, 22 May 2017 at 07:11:18, more than 15 hours before the supposed bomb went off.
Richard D. Hall concludes that there was an additional drill in the morning where this still was taken.
I find this hard to believe...
The person who placed the bag ran away off before it exploded, so there was no suicide bomber.
Richard D. Hall did an analysis of the injuries to conclude that most injuries aren't convincing, and for those that are there is no evidence that they were the result of the Manchester Arena bomb.
The biggest problem with the book is the ridiculous long analysis of the statements by the witnesses in the foyer. The first problem is its length, from page 65 to 406!!!
Even more damaging is that Hall doesn't restrict himself to strong arguments (apparent contradictions in what they said), but also makes up reasons for why the statements are unconvincing that aren't very strong. Unfortunately this reduces the credibility of Hall...
I skipped through most of this section, so I missed most of Hall's arguments on this.
Richard D. Hall - Manchester, The Night of the Bang:
https://cdn1.richplanet.net/pdf/Night_of_the_Bang.pdf
(
http://web.archive.org/web/202304250627 ... e_Bang.pdf)
Hall didn't list this photo as suspicious that shows an obvious photoshop fail (published by the mainstream media)...
Salman Abedi, suicide bomber, on the far right is obviously photoshopped in.
Just look at the shadows on his face and neck and you see that the sun is coming from another direction for him than for the other 3 boys.
A possible motive for photoshopping Salman in this picture is because his father, Ramadan – also arrested, has denied that Salman has ever been in Libya (according to the state media he recently went over there).
For more on the Manchester false flag hoax (I didn't find a thread on this topic on the Crowhouse):
https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... =31&t=1092
