H.G. Wells: Time Traveler

[Shadowfax]

In 1933, member of the Round Table H.G. Wells wrote about how the (coming) Second World War could be used to install a one world government in “The shape of things to come”.

Wells described in Book 2, Chapter 5 “THE FADING VISION OF A WORLD PAX: JAPAN REVERTS TO WARFARE”:
1) a war in Asia;
2) Japan would invade China;
3) the US army would fight against Japan.

And in Book 2, Chapter 9 “THE LAST WAR CYCLONE, 1940-50”:
4) in Europe the war between Nazi Germany and Poland would start in January 1940 (instead of September 1939);
5) with on one side (the Axis) Germany, Austria and fascist Italy fighting.

So it looks like they simply used Wells' scenario...

H.G. Wells - The shape of things to come (1933): http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks03/0301391h.html

Have many thoughts on all that
Just cant type well lately
Maybe I will find a window to respond. Thanks for all the great info
Grateful

A good presentation by G. Edward Griffin on the RoundTable
The Quigley Frormula

[Firestarter]

The handled of H.G. Wells, Lord Bertrand Russell, published his book on (pseudo) science in 1931.
The first part of the book is boring, and it only starts to get interesting in chapter 9 "Technique in Physiology".

I find chapter 15 "Education in a Scientific Society" on a caste system where the lower class is destined (educated) to serve the higher "superclass" the most interesting, as it effectively describes some of the discrimination I faced at school and work as a talented boy, young man. Of course in our Brave New World a white man younger than 40 can't be discriminated against, according to political correctness...
See some excerpts.
.

Ordinary men and women will be expected to be docile, industrious, punctual, thoughtless, and contented. Of these qualities probably contentment will be considered the most important. In order to produce it, all the researches of psycho-analysis, behaviourism, and biochemistry will be brought into play. Children will be educated from their earliest years in the manner which is found least likely to produce complexes. Almost all will be normal, happy, healthy boys or girls.
(...)

Formal lessons, in so far as they exist, will be conducted by means of the cinema or the radio, so that one teacher can give simultaneous lessons in all the classes throughout a whole country.
(...)

On those rare occasions, when a boy or girl [is] the intellectual equal of the rulers, a difficult situation will arise, requiring serious consideration. If the youth is content to abandon his previous associates and to throw in his lot whole-heartedly with the rulers, he may, after suitable tests, be promoted, but if he shows any regrettable solidarity with his previous associates, the rulers will reluctantly conclude that there is nothing to be done with him except to send him to the lethal [death] chamber before his ill-disciplined intelligence has had time to spread revolt. This will be a painful duty to the rulers, but I think they will not shrink from performing it.
(...)

A great deal of scientific knowledge will be concealed from all but a few. There will be arcane reserved for a priestly class of researchers, who will be carefully selected for their combination of brains with loyalty. One may, I think, expect that research will be much more technical than fundamental. The men at the head of any department of research will be elderly, and content to think that the fundamentals of their subject are sufficiently known. Discoveries which upset the official view of fundamentals, if they are made by young men, will incur disfavour, and if rashly published will lead to degradation.

.
https://isgp-studies.com/bertrand-russe ... ctatorship
Bertrand Russell - The Scientific Outlook (16.2 MB)
https://ia802608.us.archive.org/16/item ... 217mbp.pdf

[Shadowfax]

The handled of H.G. Wells, Lord Bertrand Russell, published his book on (pseudo) science in 1931.
The first part of the book is boring, and it only starts to get interesting in chapter 9 "Technique in Physiology".

I find chapter 15 "Education in a Scientific Society" on a caste system where the lower class is destined (educated) to serve the higher "superclass" the most interesting, as it effectively describes some of the discrimination I faced at school and work as a talented boy, young man. Of course in our Brave New World a white man younger than 40 can't be discriminated against, according to political correctness...
See some excerpts.
.

Ordinary men and women will be expected to be docile, industrious, punctual, thoughtless, and contented. Of these qualities probably contentment will be considered the most important. In order to produce it, all the researches of psycho-analysis, behaviourism, and biochemistry will be brought into play. Children will be educated from their earliest years in the manner which is found least likely to produce complexes. Almost all will be normal, happy, healthy boys or girls.
(...)

Formal lessons, in so far as they exist, will be conducted by means of the cinema or the radio, so that one teacher can give simultaneous lessons in all the classes throughout a whole country.
(...)

On those rare occasions, when a boy or girl [is] the intellectual equal of the rulers, a difficult situation will arise, requiring serious consideration. If the youth is content to abandon his previous associates and to throw in his lot whole-heartedly with the rulers, he may, after suitable tests, be promoted, but if he shows any regrettable solidarity with his previous associates, the rulers will reluctantly conclude that there is nothing to be done with him except to send him to the lethal [death] chamber before his ill-disciplined intelligence has had time to spread revolt. This will be a painful duty to the rulers, but I think they will not shrink from performing it.
(...)

A great deal of scientific knowledge will be concealed from all but a few. There will be arcane reserved for a priestly class of researchers, who will be carefully selected for their combination of brains with loyalty. One may, I think, expect that research will be much more technical than fundamental. The men at the head of any department of research will be elderly, and content to think that the fundamentals of their subject are sufficiently known. Discoveries which upset the official view of fundamentals, if they are made by young men, will incur disfavour, and if rashly published will lead to degradation.

.
https://isgp-studies.com/bertrand-russe ... ctatorship
Bertrand Russell - The Scientific Outlook (16.2 MB)
https://ia802608.us.archive.org/16/item ... 217mbp.pdf

I always believed Robert David Steele was an agent

But I ran across this video the other day and couldn't think of a better person to ask about the symbols and the secret society associations she indicates in this

I wonder if you have any thoughts on that Firestarter?

[Firestarter]

But I ran across this video the other day and couldn't think of a better person to ask about the symbols and the secret society associations she indicates in this

As my way of looking at conspiracies isn't very "visual", I'm not too good with symbolism...
Maybe you like Texe Marrs; in the following thread are several links to his (freely readable) books, with lots of information on the New Age and symbolism: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 5579#p5579


.

I always believed Robert David Steele was an agent

As for David Steele I only know about him from his apparences on Infowars and as THE face of the mock trials of the ITNJ that often featured the sort of "conspiracy theorists" that mix up facts with an unhealthy amount of disinformation. That was more than enough for me to ignore him.

It could even be that the exposés of Sgt. Michelle Foy were the reason he was killed last year (reportedly of COVID).
I'm afraid I didn't even knew who Sacha Stone was before seeing her video...

[Shadowfax]

As my way of looking at conspiracies isn't very "visual", I'm not too good with symbolism...
Maybe you like Texe Marrs; in the following thread are several links to his (freely readable) books, with lots of information on the New Age and symbolism: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 5579#p5579


.

I always believed Robert David Steele was an agent

As for David Steele I only know about him from his apparences on Infowars and as THE face of the mock trials of the ITNJ that often featured the sort of "conspiracy theorists" that mix up facts with an unhealthy amount of disinformation. That was more than enough for me to ignore him.

It could even be that the exposés of Sgt. Michelle Foy were the reason he was killed last year (reportedly of COVID).
I'm afraid I didn't even knew who Sacha Stone was before seeing her video...

Thanks for the response
I liked Texe Marrs very much. Bit of a holy roller but he had allot to say. Much to teach

Sacha Stone I was pointed to via a friend on freedom cells and she really liked him. I think he appeals a great deal to younger generations. I\m not sure what to think anout so many personalities out there. There is such an active controlled opposition element. And
I'm not a fan of Alex Jones and I tend to take what William Cooper said about him to heart and very seriously. Mike Adams is close to him and I think supplies much of what Jones sells. My recent post where Len Horowitz had nothing good to say of Adams left a lasting impression with me too

I have done a fair amount of study of the Fabians
I think them to be a top tier in the pyramid and that they are responsible for much of the grand plan of the overlords
I have a couple pieces posted on my channel about them; but this one is pretty good too

GEORGE ORWELL, 1984 & THE FABIAN WINDOW

[Firestarter]

The handled of H.G. Wells, Lord Bertrand Russell, published his book on (pseudo) science in 1931.

Bertrand Russell adopted the Frankfurt School's ideas for mass social engineering which he described in his 1951 book "The Impact of Science on Society".
Willi Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s goals with: "We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks".

In 1923 the "Institute" was officially established with funding from Felix Weil (1898-1975). One of the people involved with founding the Frankfurt School was the Jewish Hungarian banker son Georg Lukacs.
When Hitler came to power, the members of the Institut relocated to the US, where they infiltrated the major US universities including: Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and Berkeley.

Later the Frankfurt School included as members: Herbert Marcuse (the 1960s guru of the New Left), Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Erich Fromm (the writer), Leo Lowenthal, and Jurgen Habermas.

The "Frankfurt School" was a group of German-American scholars who developed a method to destroy society as we know it, to makes the herd easier to control through a "quiet cultural revolution" that included:
1. The creation of racism offences; 2. Continual change to create confusion; 3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children; 4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority;
5. Mass immigration to destroy identity.; 6. The promotion of excessive drinking, 7. Emptying churches; 8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime;
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits; 10. Control and dumbing down of media; 11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.

Needless to say that the Frankfurt School's dogma also promoted the radical feminist pronouncements that has dominated all major newspapers, television programmes and education (until it was overrun by the LGBT madness: https://archive.ph/2Sq3K

[Firestarter]

The Frankfurt school (really called the Institute for Social Research) after it relocated to New York, in the 1930s was funded by the American Jewish Committee.
The Institute developed a critical social theory of which the heart and soul consisting of fighting anti-Semitism.

The American Jewish Committee had been co-founded by Zionist banker Jacob H. Schiff, affiliated with the Rothschild and Warburg families.
Not very surprising, in the 1930s the Anti-Defamation League also worked with the American Jewish Committee to spy on activities of the German-American Bund and other "pro-Nazi" groups in the US.

The Frankfurt school's Max Horkheimer and Theodor Wisegrund Adorno promoted the idea that fascist anti-Semitism comes from people who are too obedient to an authoritarian government: https://newpol.org/review/frankfurt-school-and-jews/
(https://archive.ph/j7Ukj)

[Firestarter]

The Frankfurt school's focused on technology and entertainment for brainwashing purposes.
Technology could make individuals conform to the dominant patterns of thought and behaviour, and provide powerful instruments of social control.

In 1941, the Frankfurt school's Herbert Marcuse argued that technology constitutes an entire "mode of organizing and perpetuating (or changing) social relationships, a manifestation of prevalent thought and behavior patterns, an instrument for control and domination".

In 1969, the Frankfurt school's Walter Benjamin described how new mass media were supplanting older forms of entertainment, and newer releases replaced the interest in art of an earlier era.

The Frankfurt school's Jurgen Habermas described how the relationship between public debate and individual participation had been fractured into a realm of political manipulation and spectacle. "Citizens" become spectators of media presentations and are reduced to "objects of news, information, and public affairs".

Inasmuch as the mass media today strip away the literary husks from the kind of bourgeois self-interpretation and utilize them as marketable forms for the public services provided in a culture of consumers, the original meaning is reversed.

https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/ke ... school.pdf

[Shadowfax]

The Frankfurt school's focused on technology and entertainment for brainwashing purposes.
Technology could make individuals conform to the dominant patterns of thought and behaviour, and provide powerful instruments of social control.

In 1941, the Frankfurt school's Herbert Marcuse argued that technology constitutes an entire "mode of organizing and perpetuating (or changing) social relationships, a manifestation of prevalent thought and behavior patterns, an instrument for control and domination".

In 1969, the Frankfurt school's Walter Benjamin described how new mass media were supplanting older forms of entertainment, and newer releases replaced the interest in art of an earlier era.

The Frankfurt school's Jurgen Habermas described how the relationship between public debate and individual participation had been fractured into a realm of political manipulation and spectacle. "Citizens" become spectators of media presentations and are reduced to "objects of news, information, and public affairs".

Inasmuch as the mass media today strip away the literary husks from the kind of bourgeois self-interpretation and utilize them as marketable forms for the public services provided in a culture of consumers, the original meaning is reversed.

https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/ke ... school.pdf

History of The Frankfurt School

https://www.brighteon.com/5445fab0-97dd ... 0957a84a2a