COVID-19 infertility vaccines

This section covers all topics relating to Covid, Lockdown and the new normal.
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 108 times

COVID-19 infertility vaccines

Post by Firestarter »

From the start of this pandemic, I’ve thought that the main purpose of the corona vaccines is to make women infertile in the latest depopulation scheme.
If these experimental mRNA-vaccines indeed permanently alter the DNA, this infertility would also be for life.


The short story is that the COVID-19 vaccine learns the immune system to fight against spike proteins, including syncytin-1, which is essential for the formation of the human placenta.
An immune response against the spike protein, could also attack synctin-1, which would cause infertility in women: https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr ... -petition/
(https://archive.is/e9yHJ)


From the petition of German doctor Wolfgang Wodarg and British doctor Michael Yeadon.
XI. Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., “Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses” - http://virological.org/t/response-to-nc ... iruses/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses.
There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile. To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included.

According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention).
This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of postvaccination infertility could be observed.
https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content ... hibits.pdf
(http://web.archive.org/web/202012051511 ... hibits.pdf)


The UK has already approved the genocidal Pfizer coronavirus vaccine, with the first victims to be poisoned as early as next week. The official documents confirm that the vaccines haven’t been properly tested.
Because side effects of the vaccine on pregnant women aren’t known, the vaccine shouldn’t be given to pregnant women.
There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2. Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy.
For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.
http://web.archive.org/web/202012050000 ... accine.pdf
Donald Trump, another puppet controlled by the international elite: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 8&start=60
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 108 times

Re: COVID-19 infertility vaccines

Post by Firestarter »

The following article is the most “informative” I’ve found on the hypothesis that the COVID-19 vaccines will sterilise women by mobilising the immune system against syncytins.
It’s not a “good” article because the writer ignores all of the evidence against the coronavirus “pandemic” and the vaccine trials, with the following conclusion.
In short, the claim that the vaccines for COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 will cause infertility because of some kind of crossreactive immune response between the spike protein antigens and syncytin proteins is baseless.
https://archive.is/7Bmc2


What the writer of the previous propaganda piece forgets to take into account is that the vaccine trials were/are a complete charade, so that it’s far from “baseless” to assume that these vaccines cause severe harm.
Basically these experimental mRNA vaccines have been approved without knowing their efficacy or adverse effects.

By staging the pandemic these psychopaths have effectively bypassed doing any form of decent study into the efficacy and adverse effects of these experimental mRNA-vaccines.
With the result that big pharma can directly start their sick experiments on the population. Human experiments like these are in violation of the Nuremberg code.
It can’t be seen as voluntarily “consent”, if people get misinformed about these vaccines, and on top of that will be forced to take them, because it is required for work (besides for travelling, or doing “normal” things like going to a bar or restaurant).


The following confirms that we’re talking about an experiment on humans on a massive scale, which involves “tracking systems” to “ensure that patients each get two doses of the same vaccine and to monitor them for adverse health effects”.
Maybe somebody should point out that these health effects should be monitored BEFORE everybody gets poisoned with the vaccines in an independent scientific trial…

Official OWS show that the vaccine human guinea pigs will be monitored for 24 months after the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine through a “pharmacovigilance system” (what?!?).
OWS describes one of its “four key tenets” as “traceability” to: 1) “confirm which of the approved vaccines were administered regardless of location (private/public)”; 2) to send a “reminder to return for second dose”; and 3) to “administer the correct second dose”.

Despite claims that the “pharmacovigilance surveillance system” would intimately involve the FDA. In September, top FDA officials complained they were barred from attending OWS meetings and could not explain the operation’s organisation because it is essentially a top-secret Pentagon program: https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com ... two-years/
(https://archive.is/HwRgJ)
Donald Trump, another puppet controlled by the international elite: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 8&start=60
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 108 times

Re: COVID-19 infertility vaccines

Post by Firestarter »

Vaccinations with the DNA-altering corona vaccines have begun in the UK…


Most people will quickly dismiss the “conspiracy theories” that the not properly tested corona vaccines will sterilise women, because we are too smart to be fooled like that.
There is hard evidence that the same psychopaths that make a nice profit from shoving the sustainable development down our throats, are very concerned with the problem of overpopulation and consider vaccines (and health care in general) as the solution to too much useless eaters.


In 1972, the United Nations, World Health Organization (WHO) and World Bank collaborated on the “Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP)” to “coordinate, promote, conduct, and evaluate research in human reproduction”.
In 1972, the WHO founded the “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation” to produce an hCG-laced anti-fertility vaccine.
This has continued to produce vaccines for “fertility regulation”, see the following report from 1991: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1874951
(http://archive.is/HG8pN)


In 1973, Stevens and Chrystle published a report on anti-fertility vaccines, which showed that hCG can be used to sterilise women.
Here’s the abstract of “Effects of Immunization with Hapten-Coupled HCG on the Human Menstrual Cycle” (1973): http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Ab ... _on.1.aspx


In 1976 another study on hCG was published by A. Pala et al “Immunization with hapten-coupled hCG-β subunit and its effect on the menstrual cycle” (1976), only the abstract: http://www.contraceptionjournal.org/art ... 0009-3/pdf



And then there’s the infamous 1974 National Security Council Document 20506: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests. Written by none other than Nobel Prize winner for peace, Henry Kissinger...
They identified India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Columbia as problematic:
29. While specific goals in this area are difficult to state, our aim should be for the world to achieve a replacement level of fertility, (a two-child family on the average), by about the year 2000. This will require the present 2 percent growth rate to decline to 1.7 percent within a decade and to 1.1 percent by 2000.
(…)
In less developed countries growth rates average about 2.4 percent. For the People's Republic of China, with a massive, enforced birth control program, the growth rate is estimated at under 2 percent. India's is variously estimated from 2.2 percent, Brazil at 2.8 percent, Mexico at 3.4 percent, and Latin America at about 2.9 percent. African countries, with high birth as well as high death rates, average 2.6 percent; this growth rate will increase as death rates go down.
(…)
Steady increases in the number of acceptors at family planning facilities indicate a likelihood of some fertility reduction in Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, Colombia, and other countries which have family planning programs. On the other hand, there is little concrete evidence of significant fertility reduction in the populous countries of India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, etc.1
(...)
concentrating on the education and indoctrination of the rising generation of children regarding the desirability of smaller family size.
(…)
Considerable reduction in infant and child mortality is possible through improvement in nutrition, inoculations against diseases, and other public health measures if means can be devised for extending such services to neglected LDC populations on a low-cost basis. It often makes sense to combine such activities with family planning services in integrated delivery systems in order to maximize the use of scarce LDC financial and health manpowder (sic.) resources (See Section IV). In addition, providing selected health care for both mothers and their children can enhance the acceptability of family planning by showing concern for the whole condition of the mother and her children and not just for the single factor of fertility.
(…)
Research indicates that female wage employment outside the home is related to fertility reduction. Programs to increase the women's labor force participation must, however, take account of the overall demand for labor; this would be a particular problem in occupations where there is already widespread unemployment among males. But other occupations where women have a comparative advantage can be encouraged.
(…)
d. Sterilization of men and women has received wide-spread acceptance in several areas when a simple, quick, and safe procedure is readily available. Female sterilization has been improved by technical advances with laparoscopes, culdoscopes, and greatly simplifies abdominal surgical techniques. Further improvements by the use of tubal clips, trans-cervical approaches, and simpler techniques can be developed. For men several current techniques hold promise but require more refinement and evaluation. Approx. Increased Cost $6 million annually.
https://archive.is/ay8aG


The Gates Foundation is heavily involved in vaccinating the world.
In the following 29:32 video Bill Gates, in a presentation for the TED 2010 conference, explains that we need “solutions” that will make the “miracle” of zero CO2 emission happen. By 2050 we must realize an 80% reduction in CO2 emission...
Gates explains that “people” (P) are at the basis of this “problem” (4:00-4:55)
It includes the following notorious quote: “The world today has 6.8 billion people … that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.
Donald Trump, another puppet controlled by the international elite: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 8&start=60
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 108 times

Re: COVID-19 infertility vaccines

Post by Firestarter »

The GAVI Alliance was founded in 2000 with the help of the Gates Foundation, other donors include: the Rockefeller foundation, UNICEF, World Health Organization (WHO), and World Bank.
GAVI has the goal of vaccinating the entire third World.
Obviously part of the plan is to reduce fertility for depopulation purposes.

The research by Jurriaan Maessen, is an important source for information on anti-fertility vaccines.
There are not only vaccines to reduce fertility, but pregnant women are forced to get vaccinated, which has caused abortions in Thailand and the Philippines: http://www.oldthinkernews.com/2010/09/0 ... reduction/


Jurriaan Maessen noted, that Rockefeller had already conceived sterilisation vaccines way back in the 1930s:
Rockefeller Foundation minion Max Mason, who acted as president in the mid-1930s, on multiple occasions expressed his master’s desire for an “anti-hormone” that would reduce fertility worldwide. Now keep in mind, this is more than 35 years before the Foundation actually mentioned funding “anti-fertility vaccines” in subsequent annual reports from 1969 onward.
.
In 1973, the Mexican birth rate was unashamedly described as a “Population Bomb” in the state media.
Image

In 1974, a group of Mexicans found out (or at least suspected) that a group disguised as inoculation teams “who looked like foreigners” gave shots at schools to sterilise their children. The teams were escorted by the police.
Vaccination was never done at Mexican schools, so the parents had a good reason to be suspicious.

The “rumours” began in the north in Nuevo Leon, and then reached Mexico City, where thousands of angry parents “in slum areas” stormed and barricaded schools, and removed their children from them. Some 35-40% of elementary kids were absent Wednesday of that week.
According to the National Action party: “The rare vaccine, until now never used, much less as part of a campaign which appears to cover many parts of the republic, is given to each child in three places: the umbilicis, the chest, and the spinal column”.
The government denied the “rumours”, claiming that sterilisation vaccines don’t exist.
Image

Coercive sterilisations under the banner of “family planning” were taking place all over the globe in 1974. In April 1974, it was reported that the government had sterilised some 1,204 girls and boys under the age of 21 at federally funded clinics across the country. This included a ten year old, an eleven year old, and ten 13 year olds.
The US government had funded sterilisations on: poor women, the mentally ill, deaf, blind, with Epilepsy, and others who were considered “unfit” to have babies.
(EDIT original was deleted: truthstreammedia.com/2015/05/07/who-attempted-the-covert-sterilization-of-mexican-school-children-with-vaccines-in-1974/)
http://archive.is/zxQ34
Donald Trump, another puppet controlled by the international elite: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 8&start=60
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 108 times

Re: COVID-19 infertility vaccines

Post by Firestarter »

While there has never been any evidence that vaccines actually prevent disease, I have to admit that – while the unvaccinated are healthier than the vaxxed - the adverse effects are relatively benign: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... =21&t=1346


This sort of confirms that there must be another motive for pushing these vaccines ad nauseum.
For me the only “reasonable” explanation is that these vaccines will sterilise women (girls)...


This makes it all the more troubling that several bills have been passed to become part of the legislation that allows them to vaccinate children without the consent of their parents (who just to be on the safe side, won’t be informed of this crime against humanity): viewtopic.php?f=17&t=2034
Donald Trump, another puppet controlled by the international elite: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 8&start=60
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 108 times

Re: COVID-19 infertility vaccines

Post by Firestarter »

A 2010 study conducted by the Philippine Medical Association (PMA) indicated that Philippine women were “unwittingly vaccinated against their own children”.
By linking hCG with tetanus antigens in a vaccine, researchers fool a woman’s immune system into producing antibodies against hCG, which makes her allergic to her own embryo.
Once her immune system is sufficiently stimulated against hCG, the pregnant woman will spontaneously abort the embryo: https://www.pop.org/bad-blood-in-the-philippines/


The following report shows that influenza vaccination causes abortions in lab animals; Ayoub & Yazbak “Influenza Vaccination During Pregnancy: A Critical Assessment of the Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)” (2006). Image
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/ayoub.pdf


The 1978 WHO task force “Evaluating the safety and efficacy of placental antigen vaccines for fertility regulation”, shows initiatives to use vaccines for reduced fertility.
It even shows that they already knew then that hCG can cause abortions.
Although substantial progress has been made over the last few years in the provision of family planning services to many of the World's populations, there is still an urgent need for a greater variety of safe, effective and acceptable methods of fertility regulation to meet widely differing personal, cultural and service requirements.
Immunization as a prophylactic measure is now so widely accepted that it has been suggested that one method of fertility regulation which might have wide appeal as well as great ease of service delivery would be an anti-fertility vaccine.
(…)
In principle, anti-fertility vaccines may: (a) prevent sperm transport and/or fertilization; (b) prevent or disrupt implantation; and (c) prevent blastocyst development.
(…)
Several potential complications have to be considered upon immunization of humans with immunogenic conjugates of HCG-derived antigens. Some of these hazards are related to potential disruption of the endocrinological balance and maternal-embryonal relationships; others are related to the possible autoimmunity induced with human-derived material as an autoantigen. Consideration of these potential hazards should provide guidelines for design and evaluation of animal and human studies.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 5-0170.pdf
Donald Trump, another puppet controlled by the international elite: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 8&start=60
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 108 times

Re: COVID-19 infertility vaccines

Post by Firestarter »

In May 2020 (?), a video was uploaded to and deleted by Youtube that a GSK whistleblower exposed that the COVID-19 vaccine will make 97% of the women infertile...
As I haven't seen the video, and wouldn't know how to find it, I can only say something on the articles about this video that contain interesting information on sterilisation vaccines.

In Kenya in October 2015, pharmaceutical company Agriq-Quest Ltd had their licence revoked for sterilising half a million girls using anti-HCG in the tetanus vaccine.

A study from 1994, presenting "evidence of the feasibility of a vaccine for control of human fertility” describes how the HCG sterilisation vaccines work:
We report here results of clinical trials on a birth control vaccine, consisting of a heterospecies dimer of the beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) associated noncovalently with the alpha subunit of ovine luteinizing hormone and conjugated to tetanus and diphtheria toxoids as carriers, that induces antibodies of high avidity (K(a) approximately 10(10) M-1) against hCG.
Whilst, the antibody response declines with time; fertility was regained when titers fell to < 35 ng/ml.
As fertility came back, "booster shots" are needed!

This explains that because it doesn't give other indications of sterilisation, it could be used covertly:
An advantage in choosing hCG as a target for immunocontraception is that its inactivation would not interfere with other physiological processes in the female, such as ovulation and production of sex steroid hormones.
.
Another this study from 1989 about “Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females" adds the following on hCG vaccines:
Vaccines inducing antibodies against the human chorionic gonadotropin have gone through phase I trials with satisfactory results. A vaccine producing a consistently bioeffective antibody response against gonadotropin-releasing hormone is ready for phase I/II clinical trials in patients of carcinoma of prostate after due experimenation in animals and toxicology studies. Research to identify sperm antigens for incorporation into second generation vaccines is in progress.
https://healingoracle.ch/2020/05/13/cor ... fertility/
(https://archive.is/frARP)


The following is a typical "debunking" story, that does such a poor job that this actually makes the original, deleted video more convincing to me...
There is however some additional information on the original deleted Youtube video.

Maybe the following (61 from 63) is where the 97% figure comes from.
The speaker also says that GSK tested 63 women with a vaccine containing anti-hGC antigens that resulted in 61 becoming infertile (5m29s). Those statistics also appear in the 1989 paper and an older one, by one of the same researchers and are not related to GSK.
.
See the following example.
In the video the speaker says he wants to “look at who is running the vaccine trial” and names Dr Andrew Preston from the University of Bath, saying he “spoke on television the other night”. Phoenix says Dr Preston received a £28 million grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which he claims is “interfering and trying to manipulate” human vaccine trials."
It goes on to explain that this is all preposterous while admitting that Andrew Preston had an important role in the vaccine trials, and admitting that Preston received (part of) a £28 million grant from amongst others the Gates Foundation for another vaccine trial...

Even more ridiculous is that because one of the referenced studies in the video concerns cancer vaccines, this is no smoking gun (I really don't understand the "debunking argument")!
Prof Griffin said the 1989 paper referred to in the video “was obviously very deliberately about a vaccine for contraception or cancer research”.
This is all the more suspicious against the background that HPV vaccines (that have been marketed as cancer vaccines) are known to reduce fertility in women (maybe more on that in a next post):
https://www.aap.com.au/covid-19-vaccine ... from-1989/
(https://archive.is/0iq13)


If you want to check the named 1989 study for yourself here it is: http://archive.vn/VIpgr


The cancer study suggests that GnRH vaccines could make men so femine that this would effectively sterilise them.
The GnRH vaccine has the potential to be effective in both men and women. A study in male rats using diphtheria toxoid as the GnRH vaccine carrier reveals that antibody titers rise, testosterone levels fall, weight of testis decreases, and the prostate disappears.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1618603/


To finish this post....
In August 2019, a couple of months before the first cases of the miraculous coronavirus were reported in Wuhan, China were reported, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer merged their consumer health care divisions...
It is of course Pfizer's sterilisation vaccine that was the first to be approved for the far from fatal COVID-19 (without a proper trial).
Donald Trump, another puppet controlled by the international elite: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 8&start=60
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 108 times

Re: COVID-19 infertility vaccines

Post by Firestarter »

What could possibly go wrong? Even if people find out about the sterilisation vaccines there's nothing we could do about it (let's call that a democracy)!


While the pacified population in the developed world have already seen the number of child births drop dramatically, the population of poor countries is still increasing.
It looks like the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine is especially designed to "fix" that "population bomb". Oxford-AstraZeneca's vaccine seems developed for precisely those countries in Latin America, Southeast Asia and Africa, where the Galton Institute has called for reducing population growth.
Almost 160 countries have already bought the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, and it is expected that India (the country with the second largest population on Earth) will approve this vaccine in a week.

The lead developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca's sterilisation vaccine - Adrian Hill and Sarah Gilbert - are closely tied to the most infamous eugenics societies in Europe.
Both Hill and Gilbert come from the Wellcome Trust.

The Wellcome Trust was originally created by Henry Wellcome, who founded the company that later became GlaxoSmithKline.
The Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics boasts of the genetic mapping they’ve conducted in Africa. The center also publishes papers that explore genetic dispositions in relation to male fertility and “reproductive success”.
The Wellcome Centre co-funds vaccines and birth control methods together with the Gates Foundation, which admits promoting population and reproductive control in Africa and South Asia by distributing long-acting, reversible contraceptives (LARCs). The Wellcome Trust has also directly funded developing methods to “improve uptake” of LARCs in places like Rwanda.

The lead developer of the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, Adrian Hill, held a senior position at the Wellcome Trust’s Centre for Human Genetics and is also closely affiliated to the Galton Institute.
Several top positions at the former British Eugenics Society (called Galton Institute since 1989) were taken by psychopaths of the Wellcome Trust, including Galton Institute’s president Turi King and Galton Institute’s Senior Genetics Researcher, Jess Buxton, who was previously ‘genetics researcher’ at the Wellcome Trust. Galton Council Member Elena Bochukova previously worked under Adrian Hill at the Wellcome Trust Center for Human Genetics.
The Galton Institute was named in honour of the so-called "father of eugenics" Sir Francis Galton. The UK Eugenics Society for more than a century has promoted racist pseudoscience to “improve racial stock” by reducing the "inferior" population (races and/or classes?).

Hill’s and Gilbert's work on the COVID-19 vaccine is through their position at Oxford's Jenner Institute (that had already started developing the corona vaccine in mid-January 2020).
The Jenner Institute’s relocation to Oxford was largely facilitated by the Medical Research Council, which donated £1.25 million in 2005 and 2006, after the decision was made to replace the institute’s original sponsors - GlaxoSmithKline, the Medical Research Council, the Department of Health - with the University of Oxford and the Institute for Animal Health (now called Pirbright Institute).

In June, Adrian Hill explained that his team was in “a race against the virus disappearing” as “We’re in the bizarre position of wanting COVID to stay, at least for a little while. But cases are declining” (it's normal that flu and cold cases in Europe and North America disappear in June...).

Emeritus professor of molecular genetics at the Galton Institute, David. J Galton, has written that the Human Genome Mapping Project had “enormously increased ... the scope for eugenics ... because of the development of a very powerful technology for the manipulation of DNA” and the new “wider definition of eugenics, would cover methods of regulating population numbers as well as improving genome quality by selective artificial insemination by donor, gene therapy or gene manipulation of germ-line cells”.
So naturally the experimental COVID-19 vaccines are DNA-altering (I'm afraid this is no joke)!

Galton didn't stipulate “whether some methods should be made compulsory by the state, or left entirely to the personal choice of the individual”: https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/12/in ... -movement/
(https://archive.is/ZmgEG)


The previously mentioned Pirbright Institute is a British charity that in November 2002 was acquired by the Queen Elizabeth II controlled QinetiQ Holdings Limited: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... =20#p69048


To finish this post on eugenics psychopaths placed in powerful positions.

The father of Elizabeth's PM Boris Johnson (of Oxford's notorious Bullingdon Club), Stanley Johnson, has been writing books promoting depopulation for almost half a century now, starting with “Life without Birth: A Journey Through the Third World in Search of the Population Explosion” (1970).

Stanley Johnson is a former employee of the World Bank and the European Commission, 2 of the most prominent promoters of the global warming scare.
Stanley Johnson wrote the introduction and commentary to the UN’s 1993 Rio Earth Summit, wherein the policies of technocratic Agenda 21 were articulated.

Boris’ maternal grandfather was James Fawcett, who assisted in writing of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948.
From 1955 to 1960, Fawcett was general counsel to the IMF and a member of the European Commission of Human Rights from 1962 to 1984 (being its president from 1972 to 1982).
From 1969 to 1973, Fawcett was also director of studies at the Royal Institute of International Affairs (a.k.a. Chatham House): https://www.winterwatch.net/2019/12/mee ... -made-man/
(http://archive.is/2NsWf)
Donald Trump, another puppet controlled by the international elite: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 8&start=60
User avatar
lake
Posts: 640
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2020 11:24 am
Has thanked: 168 times
Been thanked: 198 times

Re: COVID-19 infertility vaccines

Post by lake »

Firestarter wrote: Thu Dec 31, 2020 5:04 pm In May 2020 (?), a video was uploaded to and deleted by Youtube that a GSK whistleblower exposed that the COVID-19 vaccine will make 97% of the women infertile...
As I haven't seen the video, and wouldn't know how to find it, I can only say something on the articles about this video that contain interesting information on sterilisation vaccines.
i think your video is this one mate but the last third is just him after money and how he intended to get a dose of the vaccine to test is any ones guess .... not keen on this bloke as he put out that mandatory vaccines had been approved in the UK (back then April time?) when they hadn't! Doesn't mean that this information isn't correct though.

Vaccine Whistleblower: New vaccine causes sterility in 97% of women!

English vaccine whistle-blower from Glaxo Smith Kline: New vaccine could well cause sterility in 97% of women... While also affecting men's sexual organs too... (Clear medical explanation)... Delayed reaction until 7-10 yrs later...




https://www.bitchute.com/video/IalsQvC0XIdl/
'Those who danced were thought quite mad by those who could not hear the music'
“I am certified insane, I have papers”
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 108 times

Re: COVID-19 infertility vaccines

Post by Firestarter »

lake wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 3:17 pmi think your video is this one mate but the last third is just him after money and how he intended to get a dose of the vaccine to test is any ones guess .... not keen on this bloke as he put out that mandatory vaccines had been approved in the UK (back then April time?) when they hadn't! Doesn't mean that this information isn't correct though.
This must be the video (I still don't know how I can find deleted videos...).
The man telling the story isn't the insider. Ben Fellows is a "whistleblower" on paedophilia in the movies that I didn't find very convincing.

Information like this - on sterilisation vaccines - is difficult to find, so the source has to be some sort of "insider"...

Can you figure out any good reason for why they excluded pregnant women from the COVID-19 vaccine trials?!?
Donald Trump, another puppet controlled by the international elite: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 8&start=60
Post Reply