CDC admits coronavirus never isolated

This section covers all topics relating to Covid, Lockdown and the new normal.
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1186
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 494 times

Re: CDC admits coronavirus never isolated

Post by Firestarter »

While the PCR tests are unreliable, as they don't even know what they're looking for as the virus was never isolated, the "quick test" kits are completely preposterous.

Tanzanian President John Magufuli showed that the imported COVID-19 test kits were useless, as a goat and a pawpaw (that’s fruit) had tested positive for COVID-19.

More recently, an Austrian parliamentary member exposed the defectiveness of the bought COVID-19 rapid tests by showing in parliament that Coca Cola tested positive for COVID-19.
He commented:
The corona mass tests are worthless! This was also shown by a simple experiment in parliament, in which a cola had a positive result! But this black-green government spends tens of millions in tax money on precisely these tests.
https://greatgameindia.com/coca-cola-covid-19-positive/
The Order of the Garter rules the world: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 5549#p5549
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1186
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 494 times

Re: CDC admits coronavirus never isolated

Post by Firestarter »

In January, my friends of NBC did some story on the COVID-19 origin probably being the infamous meat market in Wuhan, China.

When the reporter asks the Chief Epidemiologist of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wu Zunyou, why the data from the Wuhan market was not released for public examination, he answers: “They didn’t isolate the virus, that is the issue” (1:37 mark).
The Order of the Garter rules the world: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 5549#p5549
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1186
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 494 times

Re: CDC admits coronavirus never isolated

Post by Firestarter »

The following "conspiracy theorist" argues that the coronavirus "pandemic" is a "hoax".
The most important argument presented (certainly in the context of this thread) is explaining that COVID-19 was never isolated.

Instead they falsely used the PCR test to detect 3 viral genes, falsely claiming this is "isolation".
Because these 3 primers only cover about half of the virus' genome, if the PCR test (after how many cycles?) is used to detect these 3 primers, this does not prove the presence of this virus (and is certainly no "isolation").

See the following 2 excerpts from the article.
When a team of Moroccan researchers investigated the epidemiology of Moroccan cases of SARS-CoV-2 they found that just 9% tested positive for three genes, 18% were positive for two and 73% percent for just one. Although, reliant upon the WHO protocols, an unknown number may have been positive for none.
The WHO do not require the detection of three or even two viral genes, one is fine. In fact a negative result is still considered a possible indicator of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The repeating of tests is encouraged, presumably until a positive test is returned.
(...)

When the researchers from the Spanish medical journal D-Salud ran the WHO's specified nucleotide sequences through the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST), which allows a comparison with published nucleotide sequences stored by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) genetic database (called GenBank), they found the WHO protocols matched numerous microbial sequences and genetic fragments of human chromosomes.
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/covid-19-hoax
(https://archive.is/MXLnl)
The Order of the Garter rules the world: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 5549#p5549
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1186
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 494 times

Re: CDC admits coronavirus never isolated

Post by Firestarter »

Firestarter wrote: Tue Jan 05, 2021 9:43 amTanzanian President John Magufuli showed that the imported COVID-19 test kits were useless, as a goat and a pawpaw (that’s fruit) had tested positive for COVID-19.
Frankly I would have been surprised if he had not died.
The "COVID-19 denier", President of Tanzania John Magufuli (61), died of heart failure at a hospital in Dar es Salaam.
Magufuli had already been "missing" since 27 February, leading to rumours that he was seriously ill.

Under Magufuli, Tanzania was among the fastest growing sub-Sahara economies, averaging 6% per year: https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/tea/ne ... ad-3326490


Magufuli wasn't the first African President who appeared in good health standing in the way of the corona world order to suddenly die of a "heart condition".
On 8 June 2020, the 55-year-old President of Burundi Pierre Nkurunziza died unexpectedly and very suddenly “following a cardiac arrest”.

Nkurunziza had refused to play along with the COVID lockdown and even ordered the WHO delegation to leave Burundi: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 091#p69091
The Order of the Garter rules the world: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 5549#p5549
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1186
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 494 times

Re: CDC admits coronavirus never isolated

Post by Firestarter »

If the magical COVID-19 virus (a.k.a. SARS-CoV-2) was never isolated in the first place, it's obvious that "antibody tests" for COVID-19 are pseudoscientific quackery.
The following is an interesting article on the "antibody deception" that shows that even if COVID-19 had been isolated it would still be completely impossible to determine which antibody is specific to COVID-19 (let alone that you could test for it).
.
I emailed one of the English-speaking world’s leading authorities on monoclonal antibodies, Harvard Medical School professor Clifford Saper, to get clarity on this. I asked him if it’s true that, as most in the antibody-commercializing arena claim, a monoclonal antibody can be created that’s specific for (that is, binds to) just one type of virus or just one other type of organism.
Saper replied: “No, there is no such thing as a monoclonal antibody that, because it is monoclonal, recognizes only one protein or only one virus. It will bind to any protein having the same (or a very similar) sequence.”
The implication of Saper’s statement is that any attempt to use a monoclonal antibody to verify the presence of the novel coronavirus will yield a large rate of false-positive results. That is, they will indicate that the novel coronavirus is detected when in fact it hasn’t been. That’s because there’s a high probability that the monoclonal antibody is binding to something else besides the virus (this is known as ‘cross-reacting’)
.
So there you have it, because an antibody will bind to any protein with a similar sequence, there can be no such thing as a COVID-19 antibody test.
.
This is part of the biomedical gold rush: by last summer already, antibodies were on track to become the most lucrative medical product, with global revenue projected to reach nearly half a trillion dollars by 2024. Profit margins in the range of 67% aren’t uncommon.
Pharma giants such as AstraZeneca, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline and Eli Lilly are among the companies grabbing the largest chunks of the novel-coronavirus-antibody market.
Please note that it's the Queen Elizabeth controlled SERCO that decides on patents in both the US and UK: https://www.rosemaryfrei.ca/the-antibody-deception/
(https://archive.is/7gryl)
The Order of the Garter rules the world: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 5549#p5549
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1186
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 494 times

Re: CDC admits coronavirus never isolated

Post by Firestarter »

According to the following scientific-looking paper, the WHO-protocol was directly derived from the January 2020 Corman-Drosten paper, even before the pandemic was started.

The greatest flaw in the COVID-19 PCR testing protocol is that the COVID virus was never properly isolated and because it looks for only 3 small segments of a coronavirus, positives are concluded when no COVID-19 is found...
The first and major issue is that the novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (in the publication named 2019-nCoV and in February 2020 named SARS-CoV-2 by an international consortium of virus experts) is based on in silico (theoretical) sequences, supplied by a laboratory in China [1], because at the time neither control material of infectious (“live”) or inactivated SARS-CoV-2 nor isolated genomic RNA of the virus was available to the authors. To date no validation has been performed by the authorship based on isolated SARS-CoV-2 viruses or full length RNA thereof.
...
This method to model SARS-CoV-2 was described in the Corman-Drosten paper as follows:
the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation, designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.
...
The design variations will inevitably lead to results that are not even SARS CoV-2 related.
.
The maximum reasonably reliable PCR treshold (Ct) is 30 cycles. Since the pandemic was started in March 2020, worldwide an amplification threshold of 35 or higher for the PCR COVID-19 test has routinely been applied, following the January 2020 recommendations of the WHO.
Above 35 PCR cycles, over 97% are false positives.
Image

Pieter Borger, et al. - External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws... (2020):https://web.archive.org/web/20210411222 ... om/report/
The Order of the Garter rules the world: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 5549#p5549
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1186
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 494 times

Re: CDC admits coronavirus never isolated

Post by Firestarter »

Because the CDC needs to rig the PCR tests for the new post-vaccine pandemic era, they now even admit that the PCR tests weren't really testing for COVID-19, as they didn't have a sample of COVID! The 07/21/2021 CDC report describes that they are now suddenly looking for a a better “reference sample” for the PCR tests (so positives for the vaccinated will be diminished).
They explain this by referencing the killer FDA report “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data".

Here is the killer quote from the FDA report - read it and weep:
During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation.
While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.
.
The first highlighted section details that as they didn't have "specimens" of "SARS-CoV-2" (COVID-19), they made "contrived samples" to be tested for using PCR.
So here the FDA admits that the PCR tests haven't been testing for COVID but instead of "available data" in labarotoria (pre-pandemic samples)! All through the pandemic up until July 2021...

To make the PCR testing even more ridiculous they emergency approved 59 different PCR tests that all test for different "specimens" from "contrived samples" they made up.
Because these test for different "samples" these 59 different tests gave different results (the second highlighted section from the previous quoted excerpt): https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/07 ... the-virus/
The Order of the Garter rules the world: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 5549#p5549
Bodhi

Re: CDC admits coronavirus never isolated

Post by Bodhi »

To my knowledge, the Sars-Cov-2 virus has never been isolated and purified from a sample taken directly from a diseased patient, where the patient’s sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material. That fact was admitted in Court by Alberta’s Chief Medical Officer of Health in the recent case of The Crown vs Patrick King.
User avatar
lighthouse
Posts: 461
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2020 2:46 am
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 264 times

Re: CDC admits coronavirus never isolated

Post by lighthouse »

Hi

"
They forgot to take into account that according to the CDC, only 6% of all coronavirus deaths (in the US) were related to the coronavirus alone; on average there were 2.6 additional (possible) causes per death."

So the survival rate the many alt channels are repeating should be more like 99.9999..% ?
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1186
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 494 times

Re: CDC admits coronavirus never isolated

Post by Firestarter »

The COVID plandemic was staged by using the PCR test in a way it shouldn't, following the pseudoscientific Drosten report.
The COVID virus was never isolated, but instead synthesised by a computer program, which means that there is no evidence whatsoever that the COVID pandemic is caused by a coronavirus.
The Order of the Garter rules the world: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 5549#p5549
Post Reply